25 Comments »

jakefree24 said:

@Eldeecue Yeah, Beck, O’Reilly, Ingraham, Miller, Hannity, real first class journalist there, Oh don’t forget Palin & Rove, the best in the field.
- 6 May 2010 at 8:00 am
LokiScoutSniper said:

Yeah if I were a doctor or any other profession I’d want tax dollars coming my way to.
- 6 May 2010 at 8:16 am
AdderallApocalypse said:

ha! Lee blocked me on twitter because (at least I think it was because) he said that Glenn Beck made a “huge gaffe” in his speech at CPAC and I replied to him by saying, “hm?” LOL!
- 6 May 2010 at 9:06 am
Eldeecue said:

FOX News is the WWF of news, really….but, like HTWW, I think it’s realized that at least a third of its viewership consists of people who watch just to see how outrageous and infuriating it is….and the rest are stupid enough to watch anything that claims to be “not liberal”. Because, as we all know, “Liberal” means carcinogenic, homosexual, black gangs, and things God dun’ like. n’ baby killin’.
And subjects our women folk to the atrocity that is suffrage.
- 6 May 2010 at 10:01 am
hymnofashes said:

@Eldeecue And Fox is a jealous Network. You shalt have no sources of information before it.
(It wouldn’t be REAL information, anyway, so why would you want it?)
- 6 May 2010 at 10:02 am
Eldeecue said:

“Fox News is the only place where you can find real journalism…”
THE STUPID!
IT BURNS!
- 6 May 2010 at 11:01 am
SexedUpAtheist said:

He is a political loyalist, but don’t be too hard on him: people in general tend to use selective information to reinforce their viewpoints, and it’s all based on how the brain works (no pun intended).
- 6 May 2010 at 11:35 am
RiseRobotRise1 said:

its called cristoballs. Watch the HTWW lies and hypocrisies videos
- 6 May 2010 at 11:56 am
zetanato said:

But he only bans people who violate Youtube Terms of Service!
Now, I haven’t checked the terms of service recently, but I’m pretty sure disagreeing with HTWW is a major violation of them. :p
- 6 May 2010 at 11:56 am
Shad0wSquirrel said:

dacning pony in the rain
- 6 May 2010 at 12:19 pm
Shad0wSquirrel said:

well not thousands but it is a fuss to clean
- 6 May 2010 at 12:27 pm
underpantssquirrel said:

Not only that, but some things he has been saying by experts and “experts.” If anything, all of his “special knowledge” that he claims to have isn’t very original or special.
- 6 May 2010 at 1:16 pm
JTrizzleFizzle said:

I have to admit that HTWW is a pretty good debater, but there was always something about him that bothered me.
For one thing, he comes off as being a prick blabbing on about his ideas and how they are the true and only ideas people should be given.
He also claims to be explaining what the real experts aren’t saying, yet if you view his videos with an open mind, you’d realize that much, if not all, of what he’s saying is purely opinion.
- 6 May 2010 at 2:05 pm
Douglas1102 said:

Who hasn’t been banned by HTWW?
I got banned from “light bulb ban” for calling him on his claim that if you break a mercury light bulb you will “have to pay” thousands in clean up.
- 6 May 2010 at 3:00 pm
Mauhadeeb28 said:

“Right means more gov’t involvement SOCIALLY.”
Show me one time where Beck, Crowder, HTWW, or Rachel want more involvement socially. Just one instance. What you fail to realize is that true 20th century American conservatism i.e. right wing, want less government involvement in all facets of life. Including Economically and especially socially. The last thing conservatives want is for the government to dictate how they must live. True conservatives want freedom under any and all circumstances.
- 6 May 2010 at 3:45 pm
Mauhadeeb28 said:

There is really no point in debating either of you. You both mix and match contradicting thoughts.
You don’t need me. You can debate yourself within your own comment.
- 6 May 2010 at 3:53 pm
Mauhadeeb28 said:

And how is that?
- 6 May 2010 at 4:39 pm
tretrioeciii said:

You just won my argument for me.
- 6 May 2010 at 5:32 pm
Mauhadeeb28 said:

That is the worst spectrum I’ve ever heard. Make it simpler. Anarchy= far right. Oligarchy/dictatorship = far left.
- 6 May 2010 at 6:13 pm
RichieD814 said:

Mauhadeeb28, forgot to mention that your Alfonzo Rachel being pro-slavery comment is stupid and irrelevant, considering that the overwhelming majority of African-Americans are not Conservative Republicans like Mr. Rachel.
- 6 May 2010 at 6:40 pm
RichieD814 said:

Mauhaadeeb28, I know what right and left mean. You have been brainwashed by Faux News. Left means more gov’t involvement economically speaking, this is true. Therefore, the right didn’t want gov’t getting involved in their businesses, which were using slave labor. Right means more gov’t involvement SOCIALLY. Slavery kept blacks down SOCIALLY.
Pwned!!!
- 6 May 2010 at 7:32 pm
Mauhadeeb28 said:

Far right?!?! That is a stupid thing to say. The democrats then wanted the federal government to keep slavery and segregation legal by federal means. Meaning more federal involvement. Meaning left wing not right. You apparently have no clue what left and right is so your statement blew up in your own face.
And are you saying that Alfonzo Rachel would have been pro slavery? I don’t believe you know of what you are talking about. Learn what ‘left’ and ‘right’ mean then comment again. later.
- 6 May 2010 at 8:29 pm
TAz69x said:

HTWW will now be known As:
HTBABSHA
How to be a Ball-Sucking horse’s ass
- 6 May 2010 at 9:23 pm
RichieD814 said:

Mauhadeeb28, you destroyed your own argument with this statement in the comment below with this: “Those old Republicans, which were liberals in those days, are considered conservative by today’s standards.” Which means that the Democrats they were fighting were far-right loons (like Crowder, HTWW, Glenn Beck and Alfonzo Rachel). Thanks for proving yet again that Liberals have morality on their side.
- 6 May 2010 at 9:54 pm
Mauhadeeb28 said:

Civil rights?You mean like freeing the slaves? That was a Republican doing and they had to wage a war against Democrats to get that moving.Desegregation was brought to us by Republicans activist, which persuaded LBJ(Dem) to support it.Those old Republicans, which were liberals in those days, are considered conservative by today’s standards.
And what have hate crime laws brought to the table?Nothing at all, but they sure do sound good.
So I say to you:ITS RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU & YOU CANT SEE IT?
- 6 May 2010 at 10:26 pm

Leave your response!